Category Archives: Middle East

WTF Just Happened Today? Day 1889: “Psychological warfare.” Monday, Mar 23, 2026

WTF Just Happened Today?
Day 1889: “Psychological warfare.”
Monday, Mar 23, 2026

1/ Trump delayed his threat to “obliterate” Iran’s power plants for five days, claiming the U.S. and Iran had held “very good and productive” talks on a “complete and total” resolution of the war. Tehran, however, denied that there were any direct or indirect negotiations, calling it fake news, market manipulation, and “psychological warfare.” Nevertheless, Trump said Iran “wants to settle” the war and “very much” wants a deal and that the two sides had “major points of agreement,” including reopening the Strait of Hormuz, banning Iran from ever having a nuclear weapon, and removing its enriched uranium. Trump also suggested that any deal would amount to a “very serious form of regime change.” (NBC News / Bloomberg / NPR / Washington Post / Politico / CNBC / Associated Press / Wall Street Journal / Reuters / Axios / ABC News)

2/ Trump deployed ICE officers to more than a dozen U.S. airports to help with TSA staffing shortages during the partial DHS shutdown. Trump said the officers were meant to ease delays but suggested he could send the National Guard next, while airports and administration officials said ICE was not screening passengers and no arrests had been reported. The move came after more than 400 TSA officers quit and about 3,450 called out on Sunday, as the partial shutdown has forced TSA workers to keep working without pay. Trump and congressional Republicans have insisted on fully funding DHS, including ICE and CBP. Democrats, however, have pushed to pay for the TSA while leaving ICE and CBP unfunded, demanding new limits on ICE tactics, including clearer identification, mask restrictions, and tighter rules for forced home entries. Trump, meanwhile, said he wouldn’t support a DHS funding deal unless it also included the Republican SAVE America Act, saying Congress should “lump everything together as one and VOTE!!!” (New York Times / Associated Press / Politico / Washington Post / Wall Street Journal / CNBC)

The Senate voted 54-37 to advance Markwayne Mullin’s nomination to lead the Department of Homeland Security, putting him on track for final confirmation this week. Mullin would replace Kristi Noem. (Axios / Politico)

3/ The Supreme Court appears likely to limit mail-in voting in federal elections. The case could force Mississippi and at least 13 other states to stop counting ballots mailed by Election Day but received later. At issue is a Mississippi law that allows absentee ballots to be counted if they arrive within five business days after Election Day and were postmarked by it. The Republican National Committee argued that federal law requires both submission and receipt by Election Day. Justice Samuel Alito said late-counted ballots can undermine “confidence in election outcomes” and create an “appearance of fraud,” while Justice Neil Gorsuch called it “a contradiction” to say ballots must be cast by Election Day but need only be mailed by then. But Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett questioned whether that logic could also threaten early voting. A ruling is expected by late June. (NBC News / Washington Post / New York Times / Bloomberg / Wall Street Journal / ABC News / CNN / CNBC / Associated Press / Politico)

State Dept. fumes after insiders reveal who ‘motivated’ Trump to launch Iran war: report

State Dept. fumes after insiders reveal who ‘motivated’ Trump to launch Iran war: report

Alexander Willis
March 21, 2026, 1:26PM ET (RAWSTORY)

President Donald Trump’s decision to kick off the U.S. war against Iran last month was motivated, in part, by “pressure from outside allies,” multiple insiders told Bloomberg in its report Saturday, a revelation that sparked a fierce rebuttal from the Trump administration.

Speaking with Bloomberg on the condition of anonymity, the insiders claimed that Trump was under pressure to strike Iran from at least two individuals outside his administration. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who’s wanted by the International Court of Justice for alleged war crimes—and Rupert Murdoch, the billionaire conservative media mogul and architect of Fox News.

“[Murdoch] communicated with Trump several times as he urged the president to take on Tehran, according to one person briefed on their interactions,” Bloomberg’s report reads.

“Meanwhile, some of Trump’s closest advisers were more muted about the prospect of an armed conflict, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, the people said.”

When asked for comment, a State Department spokesperson accused Bloomberg’s sources of “not knowing what they are talking about” and “pretending that they do.”

“There is no division,” said State Department spokesperson Tommy Piggot, speaking with Bloomberg. “President Trump is making the world safer, and the entire administration is lockstep in that effort.”

In spite of Piggot’s claim, division did exist within the Trump administration over the Iran war, made evident with the recent resignation of Joe Kent, the head of the National Counterterrorism Centre, who stepped down from his position in protest and alleged that Trump was manipulated by Israel into launching the conflict.

https://www.rawstory.com/iran-war-2676524890/?utm_source=Iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Mar.21.2026_7.57pm

Bipartisan Backlash Over Trump’s Mueller Comments as Trump Set to Deploy ICE to Airports and Iran Conflict Intensifies

Bipartisan Backlash Over Trump’s Mueller Comments as Trump Set to Deploy ICE to Airports and Iran Conflict Intensifies

Aaron Parnas (Substack)
Mar 21

Donald Trump is set to deploy ICE agents to airports across the country beginning Monday. There has also been rare bipartisan condemnation following his remarks about Robert Mueller’s death, where he said he was glad Mueller had died. Meanwhile, Iran has launched its most devastating strike on Israel since the start of the war, and Trump now faces a history-defining decision as he moves closer to potentially deploying U.S. ground troops into Iran.

More than 400 TSA officers have quit since the DHS shutdown began, as many employees have been working without pay. The shutdown stems from political disagreements over immigration enforcement reforms, leaving the TSA understaffed and strained. As a result, airports are experiencing higher absentee rates and longer security wait times. Workers and travellers alike are facing financial stress and growing frustration over the situation.

Donald Trump said that he will be deploying ICE agents to airports across the country beginning on Monday.

Here is how ICE agents allegedly responded.

Children’s entertainer Ms. Rachel has begun advocating against the detention of children in ICE facilities after speaking with kids held at a Texas centre. She described troubling conditions, including poor food, limited education, and worsening health issues among detained children. The experience motivated her to work with activists and lawyers to push for the closure of the facility and reunite families in their communities. Her efforts highlight growing concern and criticism over the treatment of migrant children in U.S. detention centres.

According to CBS, the Trump administration is exploring options to secure or seize Iran’s nuclear materials as part of its broader military strategy. Planning has included potential involvement of elite U.S. special operations forces, though no final decision has been made. The effort reflects a key objective of preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons amid the ongoing conflict. Officials warn such an operation would be highly complex and risky given the nature and location of the materials.

CBS News has further confirmed that the Trump administration is actively preparing for the potential deployment of U.S. ground troops to Iran, with military planners outlining detailed scenarios. Officials have moved forces, including Marines and elements of the 82nd Airborne Division, into the region to expand available options. While Trump has publicly said he is not planning to send troops, he has left the possibility open. The preparations signal a significant escalation risk as the conflict continues.

President Donald Trump is facing a major, potentially legacy-defining decision on whether to deploy large numbers of U.S. ground troops into Iran for military operations. The plans under consideration include securing key strategic locations and nuclear materials, signalling a possible escalation of the conflict. However, many of his political allies warn that such a move could erode support for the war and jeopardize future funding from Congress. Concerns over economic impacts and upcoming midterm elections are increasing pressure on the administration to avoid deeper involvement.

Drone footage shows extensive destruction to residential buildings in Arad, Israel after a direct Iranian ballistic missile strike, highlighting the significant damage caused by the attack. The strike was part of a broader escalation in the Iran-Israel conflict, with missiles hitting southern Israeli cities and injuring over one hundred people. Several buildings were heavily damaged after at least one missile was not intercepted and hit directly. Emergency responders have been working at the scene as concerns grow over further escalation in the region.

Reuters has confirmed that the Pentagon is moving to formally adopt Palantir’s AI-powered Maven system as a core military program, expanding its use across U.S. forces. The technology analyzes battlefield data to identify potential targets and has already been used in thousands of operations. Officials say the move will deepen the integration of AI into military decision-making and strategy. While Palantir says humans still approve strikes, the expansion raises ongoing ethical and security concerns about AI in warfare.

Thousands of protesters gathered outside Japan’s parliament, with reports suggesting around 11,000 attendees opposing the war. Demonstrators expressed strong dissatisfaction with the government’s stance, with polls indicating broad public opposition. Many criticized alignment with U.S. policy, calling for a more independent approach to Japan’s future.

The protests follow the Japanese prime minister’s visit to Washington, D.C., where she was photographed by the White House in a way that many viewed as explicit support for the president of the United States:

Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi reacted during a White House visit to what was described as President Biden’s “autopen portrait.”

A large crowd gathered on Prague’s Letná Plain to protest the government of Andrej Babiš and its proposed policy changes. Demonstrators voiced concerns that the country is shifting closer to Russia, citing plans affecting public broadcasters, defence spending, and a potential “foreign agent” law. The protest reflects growing public opposition to the government’s direction. It also signals rising tensions over democratic norms and geopolitical alignment in the Czech Republic.

According to the Washington Post, Russia’s foreign intelligence service allegedly proposed staging a fake assassination attempt to boost support for Hungarian leader Viktor Orbán ahead of a tight election. The plan, described as a “game changer,” aimed to shift public focus from economic issues to emotional concerns like security and political stability. According to the report, this tactic was intended to strengthen Orbán’s position by rallying voters around him. The allegations highlight concerns about foreign interference and manipulation in democratic elections.

Shortly after this news surfaced, Donald Trump released a video promoting Orbán. The timing has raised questions and scrutiny given the geopolitical context. The situation highlights concerns about foreign influence and political messaging around elections.

According to MS Now, former FBI Director and Special Counsel Robert Mueller has died at the age of 81. He was best known for leading the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Mueller previously served as FBI director from 2001 to 2013 and was appointed special counsel in 2017. His death marks the passing of a key figure in modern U.S. law enforcement and political history.

Donald Trump is celebrating his death.

Some Republicans quickly came out in disagreement with this statement.

Here was President Obama’s response.

Plans for a summit between Donald Trump and China’s Xi Jinping have been put on hold as the Iran conflict continues, according to Politico. The delay reflects how the ongoing war is reshaping U.S. diplomatic priorities and limiting high-level international engagement. While the White House disputes that the war is the direct cause, officials have indicated scheduling will likely follow the conflict’s active phase. The uncertainty raises concerns about stability in U.S.-China relations during a sensitive geopolitical moment.

Markwayne Mullin, the Trump DHS nominee, recounted a 2022 incident in which he threatened his daughter’s teenage boyfriend during a church speech. He said he warned the boy he would “drag [his] face across the asphalt” if he saw him kiss his daughter. The remarks have resurfaced as he faces scrutiny in his nomination.

Hundreds of migrant children are being held in ICE detention far beyond the 20-day legal limit, with some cases lasting months. One 9-year-old with severe autism was detained for over 80 days without proper therapy or support, leading to severe distress and self-harm behaviours. Advocates say prolonged detention is causing serious psychological harm and developmental regression among children. The situation has raised concerns about policy violations and the human impact of extended immigration detention.

According to the Telegraph, more than 170 Royal Navy submariners have tested positive for drugs over the past seven years, including substances like cocaine, cannabis, and ecstasy. Some of those involved were serving on nuclear-armed submarines, raising concerns about safety and security. Most personnel caught were dismissed under the military’s zero-tolerance policy. The findings highlight broader concerns about stress, morale, and discipline within the submarine force.

U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres said he is cooperating with Trump’s “Board of Peace” on Gaza reconstruction efforts but criticized it as largely a personal project lacking broader effectiveness. He emphasized that the United Nations should remain the central body for managing global crises and upholding international law. Guterres also signalled the U.N.’s willingness to help de-escalate tensions in the Strait of Hormuz through coordinated international efforts. His comments highlight tensions between traditional multilateral institutions and alternative initiatives led by the U.S.

Pentagon Contradicts Trump As Democrats Revolt Against Schumer Trump Lifts Iran Sanctions; Pentagon Plans a Ground War; Senate Democrats Revolt; New Epstein Info Shocks The Conscience

Pentagon Contradicts Trump As Democrats Revolt Against Schumer
Trump Lifts Iran Sanctions; Pentagon Plans a Ground War; Senate Democrats Revolt; New Epstein Info Shocks The Conscience

Raw America
Mar 21

Trump has lifted decades-old sanctions on Iranian oil to try to cool a crisis his own generals warned him was coming, and experts say the move could hand Iran up to $14 billion to fund its war against us. The Pentagon is actively planning a ground war in Iran while Trump tells reporters he has no such plans. Senate Democrats are in open revolt over Chuck Schumer’s leadership, with a “Fight Club” of progressive senators quietly working to push him out. And newly unearthed FBI documents show that six days after Jeffrey Epstein’s death, a Bureau of Prisons team shredded massive amounts of paperwork at the jail where he died, using inmates to haul bags of documents to the dumpster.

Trump Lifts Iran Sanctions to Fight a Crisis He Was Warned About
The Treasury Department announced Friday that it is lifting decades-old sanctions on 140 million barrels of Iranian oil that have already left the Strait of Hormuz. The move is designed to relieve pressure on global oil supplies caused by Iran’s closure of the strait, a crisis Trump’s own generals warned him about repeatedly before he launched the war on February 28th.

Experts and lawmakers are struggling to make sense of the decision. By some estimates, the sanctions lift could hand Iran up to $14 billion in revenue, money that will flow directly into its war effort against the United States. “This move directly contradicts Trump’s own statements that the United States is considering winding down this conflict,” one financial risk analyst said. “You don’t unsanction Iranian oil if you’re winding down. This is the action of an administration that has no exit ramp and knows it. The word for that is desperation.”

A senior Iran researcher put it even more bluntly: “The U.S. is funding a war against itself.”

Gas prices for American consumers have already risen about 93 cents per gallon since the war began. U.S. crude oil has surged more than 70 percent since the start of the year. United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby wrote to employees this week that the company is preparing contingency plans assuming oil reaches $175 a barrel and does not return to $100 until the end of 2027.

Before Trump launched this war, Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned the president in multiple briefings that Iran would likely disrupt the Strait of Hormuz in response to a U.S. attack. Trump launched the war anyway. Now he is lifting the sanctions that were supposed to be leverage in an attempt to contain a crisis that was entirely predictable because his generals predicted it.

The Pentagon is planning a ground war. Trump Says He Isn’t.
On Thursday, Trump told reporters, “No, I’m not putting troops anywhere.” On Friday night, he posted on Truth Social that the U.S. is “very close to meeting our objectives” and considering “winding down” its military efforts.

Sources say the Pentagon is actively drawing up detailed plans to deploy ground forces into Iran, including elite rapid-response units. Multiple sources briefed on the discussions say the plans include meetings on how to detain Iranian soldiers and where to send them if U.S. troops enter Iranian territory. The 82nd Airborne Division, one of the military’s premier rapid-response units, is among those being considered. Its headquarters abruptly cancelled a training exercise earlier this month.

Amphibious warships carrying roughly 4,000 service members, including about 2,500 Marines, left California this week aboard three vessels. Additional amphibious groups are en route, bringing the total expected deployment to as many as 8,000 personnel, equipped with F-35 fighter jets and amphibious assault vehicles capable of supporting a ground offensive.

When asked about the planning, the Pentagon said only that it had “nothing to announce regarding pending or future deployments.” The White House said it was simply the Pentagon’s job to give the president “maximum optionality.”

Trump said he is not putting troops anywhere. The 82nd Airborne cancelled its training exercise. Eight thousand Marines and soldiers are heading to the region. One source described the White House’s thinking on Iran’s main oil export island this way: “If he has to take Kharg Island to make it happen, that’s going to happen.” The president can say whatever he wants to reporters. The ships are already moving.

Senate Democrats Are in Open Revolt Over Schumer
A growing group of Senate Democrats has been quietly working to push minority leader Chuck Schumer out of his leadership position, and the effort is now significant enough that some senators have been conducting informal vote counts to see if they have the numbers to remove him.

Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut acknowledged at a dinner with progressive activists in February that some colleagues had been doing those counts. Murphy said Schumer retained enough support to keep his position, but the fact that the conversation was happening at all marks a significant moment for the Democratic caucus.

Senators Elizabeth Warren and Tina Smith are among those who have been most active in raising concerns and gauging frustration with Schumer’s leadership. A group of progressive senators maintains a Signal chat where members have discussed how to counter Schumer’s preferred candidates in key primary races. The group has been described by those familiar with the situation as “Fight Club.” Schumer is seen by this group as favouring centrist candidates in must-win states, including Michigan, Minnesota, and Maine, and as an impediment to a more aggressive posture against the Trump administration.

The frustrations have deep roots. During last fall’s lengthy government shutdown, Schumer reportedly told Warren that no one was negotiating a deal with Republicans, while a separate group of centrist Democrats was doing exactly that. Senate staff have taken to calling the experience of being given conflicting information by the leader getting “Schumed.”

Schumer said in an interview that his support in the caucus is “deep and strong” and that he hasn’t heard of any efforts to replace him. He declined to say whether he plans to run for re-election in 2028 or whether he intends to seek another term as leader after November’s midterms.

Democrats are feeling increasingly optimistic about Senate races in North Carolina, Alaska, and Ohio. But some of Schumer’s critics worry that a strong November showing will only convince him to stay, and they want him to commit to stepping aside before the elections happen.

FBI Documents Show Epstein’s Jail Shredded Documents Days After His Death
A newly surfaced FBI report documents claims made by a federal corrections officer who contacted the agency six days after Jeffrey Epstein’s death in August 2019. According to the officer, a Bureau of Prisons “after-actions team” arrived at the Metropolitan Correctional Centre in New York and began shredding massive amounts of paperwork, recruiting at least one inmate to haul bags of shredded documents to a dumpster at the rear of the facility.

“There was a BOP After-Actions team that came, and they are supposed to review what happened,” the FBI report reads, summarizing the officer’s account. The officer told the FBI they found it “suspicious that an after-action team charged with investigating would be shredding huge amounts of paperwork” while FBI agents and inspector general officials were in the building conducting an active investigation. Those directing the inmate during the disposal reportedly said, “Make sure you get that box too.”

The BOP is a subdivision of the Justice Department, which at the time was part of the first Trump administration. That same Justice Department reportedly directed New York Police Department investigators to stand down in their criminal probe into Epstein five days after his death and also asked New Mexico authorities to halt their own investigation into Epstein’s Zorro Ranch property, which has been identified in a separate FBI tip as the alleged burial site of two foreign girls.

Epstein’s death was ruled a suicide. The shredding of documents during an active investigation, at the direction of a team sent to review that death, has never been fully explained. Attorney General Pam Bondi has already been accused of withholding a significant portion of Epstein files, with sources saying roughly 3.5 million of the 6 million files identified for potential release have been disclosed so far. These new documents add to a long list of questions that the Justice Department has declined to answer.

Esquire We Need a White House Insider to Stand Up to Trump’s Wartime Insanity. I’m Not Optimistic.

Esquire
We Need a White House Insider to Stand Up to Trump’s Wartime Insanity. I’m Not Optimistic.

Charles P. Pierce

I didn’t think it was possible, but the Sunday Gobshite Shows have become immeasurably worse—so immeasurably worse that I find myself pining for the comedy stylings of Fred Barnes and Morton Kondracke. To be fair, this time around, it’s not entirely the fault of the hosts and their panellists. The source of this weekly degradation of both language and the truth is entirely caused by the incredible legion of liars, grifters, incompetents, otherwise unemployables, and belligerent dickwads with whom El Caudillo del Mar-a-Lago has surrounded himself and inflicted upon the rest of us.

And it starts at the top. Doing one of his very bizarre stand-ups in the aisle of Air Force One, the president was asked about why 5,000 members of the American military were needed for duty in the totally obliterated country of Iran. Hilarity ensued. From Mediaite:

After the reporter asked, “Can you explain why you’re sending 5,000 marines and sailors?” Trump snapped, “You’re a very obnoxious person,” before moving on to another question. During the same press gaggle, Trump also attacked a reporter for asking him about a controversial fundraising email, which outraged many after it featured a photo from the dignified transfer ceremony of six U.S. servicemembers killed as a result of the ongoing Iran war.

Upon hearing the question, Trump demanded to know who the reporter worked for. After she informed him that she worked for ABC News, Trump called the network “one of the worst, most fake, most corrupt.” “Will you comment on the dead soldiers?” the reporter pressed, to which Trump replied, “You know what, ABC News?” I think it may be the most corrupt news organization on the planet. I think they’re terrible.”

Then there was Karoline Leavitt, failed congressional candidate from the state of New Hampshire, plying her trade as a White House lawn ornament.

Yes, the president is speaking with our allies in Europe and many of our partners in the Gulf and the Arab world to encourage them to do more to open the Strait of Hormuz. And our NATO allies especially need to step up…. He’s calling on them to do the right thing.

Leave aside the facts that a) the president is fairly begging the entire rest of the world to bail his sorry ass out and b) our NATO allies have every right to tell a lunatic who’s used them as a punching bag for ten years and who openly lusted after a piece of Denmark’s territory and just appreciate the feigned innocence it takes to imagine Donald Trump’s appeal to anyone to “do the right thing.” Stop it, lady. You’re killing me here

Here’s Secretary of Talking About War Pete (Call of Duty). Hegseth, blithely telling Major Garrett of CBS News that more people who are not him will have to die in pursuit of whatever the fck he and his boss are doing in Iran.

No one’s putting us in danger. We’re putting the other guys in danger. That’s our job. So we’re not concerned about that. The only ones that need to be worried right now are Iranians that think they’re going to live.

There has been a lot of talk about the need for another Walter Cronkite to rise from the unmarked grave of network news and work his magic the way that Uncle Walter did over Vietnam. (Granted, it took seven years, 21,000 American and 1.5 million Vietnamese lives, and a term and a half of Richard damn Nixon for the magic to work, but hey…) Me, I don’t think what we need is a new Cronkite. I think what we need is a new Clark Clifford.

Clifford was a veteran Washington power broker, and in March 1968, as President Lyndon Johnson’s choice to replace Robert McNamara, Clifford became secretary of defence. Clifford took office in the aftermath of the catastrophic Tet invasion the previous January. Clifford was so independently influential that he didn’t care what all the brass hats and remaining New Frontiersmen around the president thought. And, by degrees, Clifford began to move the administration away from the decades of lies and deceit surrounding the war. As Time ’s Hugh Sidey wrote at the time:

The smooth lawyer was trying his greatest case. It was, said one who observed it, “the gutsiest performance I’ve ever seen or ever heard of.” For seven months the argument raged. Johnson said little, but he was listening. Clifford threw all his weight behind arguments that persuaded the president to order the partial suspension of bombing of North Vietnam on March 31 to get talks with Hanoi under way. Again, Clifford’s view held sway when bombing was halted altogether on Oct. 31 in an effort to rescue the negotiations from stalemate.

Convinced that Saigon had become the tail wagging the Washington dog, Clifford spoke out last month and again last week when he saw the negotiations heading for an interminable deadlock. There is an undeniable and heavy risk in Clifford’s position. He has no assurance that Hanoi really wants a settlement or that the enigmatic enemy would honour a troop-withdrawal agreement. In dismissing Saigon’s concern over protocol, moreover, he overlooks the fact that, as Henry Kissinger pointed out, the “choreography” of such negotiations “is almost as important as what is negotiated.” Still, he pressed his arguments with rare force.

History has told us that Clifford’s efforts came close to pushing LBJ into a settlement that autumn, only to have Nixon, that unutterable swine, sabotage the possibility of a settlement for his own political advantage.

Where’s the Clark Clifford of 2026, someone who’s brave enough and independent-minded enough to get a pliable, half-mad old man to change this doomed crusade before everything lies in ruins? Where’s the Republican who can work Clark Clifford’s magic, or does it even exist anymore?

Revealed: Trump’s War Plan Rejected in Devastating New Poll

Revealed: Trump’s War Plan Rejected in Devastating New Poll

White House weighing ground assault on Iranian oil facilities, grieving father suggests Hegseth lied about their interaction, Bari Weiss takes chainsaw to CBS

Raw America
Mar 20

Only 7 percent of Americans support a ground invasion of Iran, but the Pentagon is asking Congress for $200 billion more to fund this war. Pete Hegseth told the country that grieving military families urged him to “finish” the fight in Iran. The father of one of those fallen service members says that conversation never happened. CBS News is laying off dozens of journalists as Bari Weiss tightens her grip on the newsroom. And the White House is weighing an assault on Iran’s primary oil export island that senior officials say would almost certainly require boots on the ground. Let’s get into it.

7 Percent. That’s How Many Americans Want a Ground War in Iran.

A new poll of more than 1,500 U.S. adults finds that just 7 percent would support Trump carrying out a large-scale ground invasion of Iran. Only 34 percent would support sending special forces. A majority, 55 percent, oppose deploying any ground troops at all. And nearly two-thirds of Americans believe Trump will eventually order a large-scale ground war anyway.

Overall, the Iran war is approved by just 37 percent of U.S. adults. About one in five Republicans opposes it. More than half of American households say they have already felt the impact of rising gas prices from the conflict.

Trump has said he does not want boots on the ground, while also saying he is “not afraid” of putting them there. “I’m not putting troops anywhere,” he told a reporter Thursday. “If I were, I certainly wouldn’t tell you.” That is not reassurance. That is a threat delivered with a smile.

The Pentagon is now requesting an additional $200 billion from Congress to fund the war. Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego put that number in context: “At the height of combat, the Iraq War cost around $140 billion per year. If the Pentagon is asking for $200 billion, they are asking for a long war.”

Trump has repeatedly insisted the conflict will be over soon. The Pentagon’s funding request tells a different story.

White House Weighing Assault on Iran’s Main Oil Export Island

Senior administration officials are actively discussing an assault on Kharg Island, the facility in the northern Persian Gulf through which Iran processes nearly all of its crude oil exports. The goal would be to pressure Iran into reopening the Strait of Hormuz. Senior officials have confirmed that any such operation, whether a blockade or an occupation, would require ground troops.

More than 2,500 Marines have already been deployed to the region, with two more units of similar size reportedly on the way.

Sources described the emerging thinking inside the administration plainly. “He wants Hormuz open. If he has to take Kharg Island to make it happen, that’s going to happen.” Another source laid out a timeline: “We need about a month to weaken the Iranians more with strikes, take the island and then get them by the balls and use it for negotiations.”

That is the plan being discussed in the White House three weeks into a war the president said would be swift. Seizing a heavily fortified Iranian island in the Persian Gulf, while 7 percent of the American public supports a ground invasion, while oil is at $111 a barrel, while the Pentagon is asking for $200 billion more.

Trump said he is not afraid of any of it. The 13 families who have already received flag-draped caskets did not get a vote on that.

CBS Lays Off Dozens as Bari Weiss Reshapes the Newsroom

CBS News announced layoffs Friday, with sources saying the cuts could affect close to 60 people, roughly 6 percent of the news division’s workforce. Editor-in-chief Bari Weiss and CBS News President Tom Cibrowski informed staff in a memo that the reductions were necessary to adapt to a changing media landscape and make room for what they called the things the network “must build to remain competitive.”

This round of cuts is widely seen inside the network as being driven by Weiss herself, marking the most significant test yet of her leadership since David Ellison installed her to reshape CBS News in a more conservative direction. Last month, 11 Evening News staffers took voluntary buyouts. High-profile correspondents including Anderson Cooper have already departed. The Evening News, now anchored by Tony Dokoupil, is drawing fewer than 4 million viewers, well behind ABC and NBC.

It is worth being direct about what is happening here. David Ellison is now closing in on acquiring CNN, HBO, and Warner Bros. Discovery. The FCC chair is threatening broadcast licenses over war coverage. A former Newsmax executive was just installed at Voice of America. And the most-watched news network built on the legacy of Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite is now being dismantled and rebuilt by an anti-woke opinion journalist whose own staff has accused her of pursuing a clearly defined political agenda.

The journalists losing their jobs today are not casualties of a changing industry. They are casualties of a deliberate effort to remake American media in the image of the people running this country. Corporate media is not failing to cover this war honestly by accident. The people who own the cameras have decided what the cameras will show. That is why independent journalism has never been more necessary, and it is exactly why Raw America exists.

Hegseth Said Grieving Families Told Him to “Finish” the War. A Father Says That’s Not True.

At a Pentagon press conference Thursday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters that after meeting with families of the six service members killed in last week’s refueling tanker crash in Iraq, he heard the same message from family after family. “They said, ‘Finish this. Honor their sacrifice. Do not waver. Do not stop until the job is done,’” Hegseth said.

That night, Charles Simmons, the father of Tech Sergeant Tyler Simmons, 28, of Ohio, told a reporter that conversation did not happen.

“When he spoke to me, that was not something we talked about,” Simmons said. He described telling Hegseth: “I understand there’s a lot of peril that goes into making decisions like this, and I just certainly hope the decisions being made are necessary.” When asked directly whether he said anything to Hegseth or Trump about continuing the war, Simmons was clear. “No, I didn’t say anything along those lines.”

He is not alone. Tyler Simmons’ cousin Stephan Douglas told a Columbus news station the war was unnecessary. “This could have been prevented. We didn’t need to be in this war.” Tyler’s grandmother Bernice Smith was equally direct. “Just to create a war because you want to create a war is not right.”

The Pentagon responded by saying Hegseth’s conversations with families were “private,” though Hegseth himself chose to describe them in detail at a public press conference. Hegseth used the grief of Gold Star families to justify continuing a war that those same families are now publicly questioning. That is worth saying plainly.

CNN is running cover. CBS is shedding the journalists who ask hard questions. The FCC is threatening anyone who doesn’t fall in line. The Ellisons of the world have corporate infrastructure and billionaire money.

NEWS: Trump Faces Mounting Internal Fractures Over Mass Deportations and Iran War as Media Consolidation Accelerates

NEWS: Trump Faces Mounting Internal Fractures Over Mass Deportations and Iran War as Media Consolidation Accelerates

Aaron Parnas (Substack)
Mar 20

There is a lot of news to cover as two major fractures are emerging within the White House and Republican circles. First, Donald Trump is now acknowledging that his mass deportation effort has not gone according to plan, while Republican leaders are quietly urging members to stop talking about it ahead of November. Second, the war in Iran is beginning to split Trump’s base, as the United States sends thousands more troops to the region in what could be preparation for a ground operation, while gas prices continue to rise.

Meanwhile, overnight, the FCC approved a massive merger between Nexstar and Tegna that will fundamentally reshape the media landscape. We are already seeing the consolidation of national media with figures like the Ellisons taking control of major networks like CBS and potentially CNN. Now local media is being consolidated as well, with a deal personally approved by Trump that could centralize control over hundreds of stations across the country.

The FCC approved Nexstar’s $6.2 billion acquisition of Tegna, creating the largest local TV station operator in the U.S., despite an ongoing lawsuit from multiple states seeking to block the deal on antitrust grounds. Critics say the approval lacked transparency and could concentrate media power significantly, with the combined company reaching over 60% of U.S. households after regulators waived existing ownership limits.

Eight states, including California and New York, sued to block Nexstar’s $6.2 billion acquisition of Tegna, arguing the merger would violate antitrust laws, reduce competition, and harm local journalism. Officials warn the deal could consolidate control of hundreds of TV stations under one company, potentially raising consumer costs and limiting independent news coverage in key media markets.

President Donald Trump is facing growing uncertainty and mounting risks in the Iran war, with analysts warning the conflict may be slipping beyond his control as it expands economically and militarily . Despite early battlefield gains, Iran has countered by disrupting global oil flows and raising costs, while the administration lacks a clear endgame, leaving Trump with a difficult choice between escalation or an increasingly hard-to-achieve exit.

Trump has privately acknowledged to advisers that some of his administration’s mass deportation policies went too far and is now pushing to scale back their visibility, shifting focus toward targeting “bad actors” rather than broad sweeps. The change reflects concern within his inner circle that aggressive immigration tactics and rhetoric like “mass deportation” may be politically damaging ahead of elections, prompting a recalibration of both messaging and enforcement strategy. This is the response from some in MAGA this morning.

According to The Guardian, the U.S. is reportedly considering occupying or blockading Iran’s Kharg Island—a critical oil export hub handling about 90% of Iran’s oil—to force Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could significantly escalate the war and expose U.S. forces to heavy retaliation. The conflict continues to intensify across the region, with strikes on energy infrastructure, drone attacks on Gulf states, rising civilian and military casualties, and growing fears of a broader economic shock driven by surging global oil prices and inconsistent messaging from Washington.

NBC News exclusively reported that the father of a U.S. service member killed in the Iran war pushed back on claims by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and President Donald Trump that grieving families urged leaders to “finish the job,” saying he never made such a statement and instead expressed uncertainty about the war’s necessity. While he described both officials as compassionate during private meetings, he emphasized that families are focused on personal loss rather than policy, raising doubts about how their sentiments are being publicly characterized as support for continuing the conflict.

As Iranians mark Nowruz, the Persian New Year, many express hope for better days after years of conflict and recent airstrikes that have disrupted daily life and caused civilian casualties. Residents describe a mix of resilience and hardship, with ongoing attacks affecting work and safety, while volunteers on the ground recount the human toll of the war, underscoring both the severity of the situation and the determination to carry on.

The Iran war is escalating with no clear end in sight, as Iran struck a major Kuwaiti oil refinery and Israel killed a senior Revolutionary Guards spokesman, while continued missile exchanges and attacks on energy infrastructure deepen regional instability . The conflict has already disrupted roughly 12% of global oil supply through the Strait of Hormuz, raising fears of a prolonged economic shock, with allies hesitant to intervene militarily and U.S. officials weighing further troop deployments even as the war grows more costly and politically risky.

A senior Iranian military spokesperson warned that U.S. and Israeli personnel could be targeted globally, including in “tourist centers” and recreational areas, as retaliation for ongoing strikes that have killed Iranian officials. The statement signals an expansion of threats beyond traditional battlefields, raising concerns about potential attacks on soft civilian locations worldwide.

NBC confirmed that President Donald Trump’s joke referencing Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor drew criticism across Asia, with commentators calling it historically insensitive and highlighting the visible discomfort of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi during the exchange. The remark fueled backlash on social media, raised concerns about diplomatic strain, and underscored broader unease in Japan over the Iran war and the stability of U.S.-Japan relations. Here is the joke in case you missed it.

Vice President JD Vance said Americans should take some comfort in the fact that U.S. allies are experiencing even worse impacts from rising gas prices, a remark that underscores the global economic strain caused by the Iran war. The comment is likely to draw criticism as energy costs surge domestically, highlighting the administration’s framing of shared hardship even as American consumers continue to face rising fuel prices.

Gas prices continue to rise. Today, the average price of a gallon of gas in the United States has hit $3.91.

The economic fallout from the Iran war is intensifying, with Scandinavian airline SAS announcing it will cancel around 1,000 flights in April after jet fuel prices doubled in just 10 days due to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. Executives warn the surge is directly hitting the aviation industry, forcing cancellations and fare increases as the prolonged conflict continues to strain global energy supplies and ripple across international travel and markets.

The Justice Department seized four internet domains linked to an Iran-affiliated hacker group accused of carrying out cyberattacks, including one targeting a U.S. medical technology company, and of posting stolen data and issuing threats against journalists and dissidents. Officials say the domains were tied to Iran’s intelligence apparatus and used to claim responsibility for hacking operations, highlighting the growing cyber dimension of the broader U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran.

Rep. Scott Perry suggested that Iran should ultimately pay the financial cost of the war, arguing the country has been in conflict with the U.S. for decades and has the resources to cover what could reach tens or even hundreds of billions of dollars. The proposal, raised during a media appearance, highlights growing debate in Washington over how to fund the rapidly escalating war, though Perry acknowledged such a scenario would likely depend on major changes inside Iran, such as regime change, making the idea highly speculative.

A medical convoy was seen, by Andrew Leyden, arriving at Walter Reed from Joint Base Andrews following a medevac flight from Germany, marking at least the third such transfer since the Iran war began and signaling a continued flow of wounded personnel back to the U.S. While officials have not confirmed whether the latest flight carried casualties from the Iran conflict, recent evacuations have included injured service members transported through Germany for treatment, underscoring the growing human toll of the war.

Iran says U.S. and Israeli strikes hit the Persian Gulf ports of Bandar Lengeh and Bandar Kangan, setting 16 civilian cargo ships ablaze and causing major damage to local infrastructure, according to Tasnim News Agency. Officials claim the attack directly impacted livelihoods, with destroyed vessels playing a key role in supporting sailors and nearby communities.

Some Republican lawmakers are reconsidering their support for subpoenaing Attorney General Pam Bondi in the Epstein investigation after a tense closed-door briefing, where Democrats walked out over her refusal to clearly commit to testifying under oath. The dispute highlights deep partisan divisions and growing frustration over the Justice Department’s handling and release of Epstein-related files, with uncertainty now surrounding whether the subpoena will move forward.

Norway’s Crown Princess Mette-Marit said she was “manipulated and deceived” in her past relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, as newly released files revealed she maintained contact with him years after his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor . The disclosures have intensified scrutiny of the Norwegian royal family, contradicted some of her earlier statements, and contributed to a noticeable drop in public support for the monarchy.

A senior FEMA disaster response official, Gregg Phillips, previously made violent and conspiratorial statements—including saying Joe Biden “deserves to die,” promoting election conspiracy theories, and claiming he once “teleported”—according to reporting by CNN’s KFile. The agency downplayed the remarks, calling them taken out of context and made in a private capacity before his current role, but the revelations raise concerns about the background and judgment of a high-ranking emergency management official.

According to The Guardian, an IRS technical glitch has obscured roughly $51 million in political donations to key state-level campaign groups, creating a major transparency gap ahead of upcoming elections. Watchdogs warn the issue—occurring after significant staffing cuts—has left required disclosures blank for months, raising concerns about oversight of influential political spending and the growing role of these groups in shaping elections.

Israeli authorities closed the al-Aqsa mosque during Eid for the first time since 1967, barring worshippers and forcing Palestinians to pray outside under heavy security, sparking outrage and fears of escalating tensions. Critics and regional organizations condemned the move as a violation of religious freedom, while Palestinians described worsening restrictions, economic hardship in Jerusalem, and deepening humanitarian distress in Gaza, where ongoing conflict continues to overshadow the holiday.

ABC news has confirmed that the Pentagon is planning to keep thousands of National Guard troops deployed in Washington, D.C. through 2029, extending a controversial federal mission tied to President Trump’s crime crackdown in the capital. The force, drawn largely from Republican-led states, has maintained a visible armed presence across the city while also performing civic duties, even as critics raise legal and political concerns and Guard resources remain strained by simultaneous overseas deployments tied to the Iran war.

“Trump’s Plan A was to hit Iran hard, watch the theocrats flee, and then hand power to a government of his own choosing. Should such things not come to pass, Plan B was … well, apparently, there was no Plan B,” Tom Nichols argues.

“Trump’s Plan A was to hit Iran hard, watch the theocrats flee, and then hand power to a government of his own choosing. Should such things not come to pass, Plan B was … well, apparently, there was no Plan B,” Tom Nichols argues.

Trump Had No Plan B for Iran
By Tom Nichols (The Atlantic)

Three weeks into Donald Trump’s war against Iran, the president has still refused to define victory other than to say the war will soon be over. From the moment he launched hostilities, he offered many rationales for the war, choosing among them like he’s picking hors d’oeuvres from a buffet at one of his golf resorts: It’s about nuclear weapons, it’s about terrorism, it’s about ballistic missiles. As the media, and the world, press him for explanations, he continues, as Pegah Banihashemi and Paul Poast wrote in The Atlantic on Wednesday, to “careen” between demanding “unconditional surrender” from Tehran and signaling “that he might abruptly declare victory and leave.”

But Trump did seem to have an overarching goal at the start of the war: regime change. In a video he released during the first night of the attack, he told the Iranian authorities to surrender and called on the Iranian people to rise up against their government. Unfortunately, the regime in Tehran seems to be recovering and, even worse, consolidating power. The American intelligence community has reportedly issued an assessment that the regime “will remain intact and possibly even emboldened, believing it stood up to Trump and survived.” Trump now appears lost, unable to comprehend how a blockbuster movie that he scripted out, one in which he cast himself as the Liberator of Iran, has turned into a poorly received miniseries that might yet be renewed for another dreary season.

The commander in chief was reportedly told that the mullahs might not agree to go gently into the night, but he seems to have waved away such concerns because he was so convinced that the Iranian regime would collapse almost immediately. According to The Wall Street Journal, when General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned the president that a U.S. attack would prompt Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz, Trump “told his team that Tehran would likely capitulate before closing the strait—and even if Iran tried, the U.S. military could handle it.”

Trump’s Plan A was to hit Iran hard, watch the theocrats flee, and then hand power to a government of his own choosing. Should such things not come to pass, Plan B was … well, apparently, there was no Plan B.

Regime change, as Americans learned the hard way in Afghanistan and Iraq, cannot merely be willed into existence. Such operations necessitate planning, the creation of an alternative government, and both the muscle and dedication to ensure that the old regime dies and a new one can take root. It requires time, and some hard thinking about what to do if the enemy regime—and the country’s population—will not cooperate with such grandiose schemes.

Trump and his officials have shied away from the term regime change, perhaps realizing that it evokes the failure in Afghanistan and the bloody struggle for Iraq. Trump, however, promised regime change to the Iranian people in his first statement on the war, released during the initial attack. He told the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the Iranian military, and the local police all to disarm and surrender or “face certain death.” Then he addressed “the great, proud people of Iran”:

I say tonight that the hour of your freedom is at hand. Stay sheltered. Don’t leave your home. It’s very dangerous outside. Bombs will be dropping everywhere. When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take. This will be probably your only chance for generations.

The president’s statement was, in some ways, puzzling. The United States had no forces on the ground and the Iranian people were hiding in their homes. To whom, exactly, were the IRGC and others supposed to offer a surrender? But one part was clear: The exhortation to take back power was a vow, to the enemy and to its people, that the American attack would end with a new government in Tehran. Since then, Trump has demanded that he be allowed to pick the new Iranian government—the very essence of regime change.

The Israelis and the Americans underscored this goal by rapidly eliminating most of the Iranian leadership. They hurried the ailing 86-year-old Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to his final reward (perhaps only a bit ahead of nature’s schedule), and dispatched at least a dozen other top figures in Tehran. Trump and his only military partner so far in prosecuting in this war, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, apparently believed that hitting Iran in a comprehensive attack, destroying its military capacity, and killing its leaders would somehow instantly produce a new reality in Iran.

Instead, the Iranian government lashed out at several countries in the region, widening the war both to sow chaos and to emphasize the danger of working with the reckless Trump administration. And in a completely predictable move, it has closed the Strait of Hormuz. Or, more accurately, it has exercised its control over the strait, allowing some ships, including its own, safe passage while counting on fear and uncertainty among ship captains and the world’s insurers to choke the flow of oil to the rest of the world and perhaps create an oil shock in the West of a kind unseen since the 1970s.

Some observers have criticized American planners for failing to anticipate such a move. This is unfair: The intelligence community and the U.S. military have analyzed, planned, and exercised for this scenario for decades. The failure came not from the national-security community, but from the civilians, and specifically the commander in chief, who evidently refused to heed warnings from his senior military advisers that the Iranians would do exactly what anyone paying attention suspected they would do.

This arrogance is likely why Trump began the war by haughtily dismissing the need for allies; he is now whining that America’s allies should help open the strait while paradoxically claiming that he doesn’t need their help. Things have gotten so far out of Trump’s control that the president of the United States has even suggested that the People’s Republic of China—the same China that his top aides think is America’s greatest threat—should become involved in the Gulf.

Ironically, Trump’s flawed decision making on Iran emulates the errors committed by someone Trump admires, and from whom he might have learned a lesson: Vladimir Putin. The Russian president launched a war against Ukraine because he was certain the government in Kyiv would collapse in a matter of days under the onslaught of Russian arms. Putin (perhaps while in isolation during the coronavirus pandemic with only a few close advisers) got it into his head that the Ukrainian regime was on the brink of collapse, and that ordinary Ukrainians were waiting for Russian liberation. He then blundered into Ukraine without a backup plan. Four years later, the Kremlin’s war is an ongoing disaster.

Both presidents made classic strategic errors. They engaged in what analysts call “scriptwriting”: They decided what they wanted to happen, and then wrote out a kind of script in which their adversaries would dutifully play their part and recite their lines. They also both seem to have ignored the standard war-gaming caution to plan for what the enemy can do, not for what you would prefer that it do.

The analogy is not exact. Most important, Putin is engaged in a war of conquest, while Trump, however ineptly, is on the side of right, even if he is in it for his own vainglory. Trump’s rush to war was shortsighted; he evaded Congress (and likely U.S. law); he overrode American public opinion. But the Iranian regime is a malignancy and a threat to global peace, and had Trump succeeded in taking it down quickly and efficiently, he would deserve some credit. Indeed, Trump could later have tried to defy the legal and moral consequences of launching a war on his own by arguing that he took a bold risk, much as George H. W. Bush did in 1990. (Bush privately told my then-boss, the late Senator John Heinz, that going to war against Iraq in Kuwait was the right thing to do, and that he was going to order the operation even if it meant his impeachment.) And Trump, unlike Putin, has not thrown a generation of young men into a meat grinder.

Or at least not yet. Trump this week ordered thousands of Marines to head to the Persian Gulf, and new reports suggest that he is considering sending thousands more. (Asked about these reports on Wednesday, Trump said, in one of his usual circumlocutions: “No, I’m not putting troops anywhere. If I were, I certainly wouldn’t tell you,” after which he added that he “will do whatever’s necessary to keep the price” of oil down.) The likely explanation for the movement of the Marines is that they are being positioned for an attempt to seize Kharg Island, a major installation that serves as one of Iran’s most important lifelines to the global oil economy. But if Trump is about to send a much larger force, he may be planning to occupy territory on the Iranian mainland in order to push back threats to the strait.

The U.S. military has long studied and planned for such operations, but on a strategic level, these moves amount to improvisation. Trump’s statements in public and to Caine imply his assumption that the war wasn’t supposed to last very long—certainly not long enough that deploying Marines would even be a question, which is probably why the Japan-based 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit wasn’t in the region at the start of the war and won’t arrive there for another week or so.

What now? Trump’s options are not appealing, as sometimes happens when a leader goes all in on a hunch and a wish. The U.S. military can continue its operations. It can go on destroying installations, enemy forces, and other targets at will. Sooner or later, as Trump himself recently suggested, the military will run out of things to bomb, but for now, the United States can keep inflicting pain on the Iranian government (and its people).

Without a clearly defined goal, however, these operations are unlikely to lead to strategic success, not least because Trump seems to still be holding on to some unrealistic notion that Iran will surrender—whatever “surrender” now means. Instead, these operations are more like an attempt to play the first days of the war over and over, in hopes that the Iranian regime will finally collapse and hand power to someone else, despite the fact that there is no “someone else” ready to take the reins. (The son of the former shah has offered his services, but he is a would-be king without a throne or an army.)

The Iranian leaders, for their part, know they can win merely by surviving. (Again, the parallel—and contrast—with Ukraine is striking: The authoritarian regime in Tehran and the democratic government in Kyiv both understand that they are winning against much more powerful opponents by stubbornly continuing to exist.) The new ayatollah and his lieutenants are likely betting that Trump’s infamously short attention span and his frustration with anything that doesn’t instantly go his way will lead him to use some arbitrary metric of destruction, call it victory, and get out.

Whatever Trump chooses to do from here, the American president is now being driven by events instead of controlling them. Like a gambler chasing his losses, he keeps investing new money to stay at the table. Worse, Trump faces far more risk today than he did during his first throw of the dice: If he quits anytime soon, he will affirm that the Iranian control of oil is an even more effective shield against regime change than any putative nuclear program.

Trump has said that the war will not last long. The Iranians have been severely weakened, and their nuclear program is, for the time being, almost nonexistent. For the president, that may be enough to declare a win and let the world’s markets (and nerves) settle back down. But if the regime survives, and Tehran keeps its fist around the throat of the global economy, Trump’s Plan A will have failed. And without a Plan B, the temptation to escalate will grow as Trump tries to spackle over the gap left by his own unwillingness to engage in judicious strategic thinking when it counted most: before the war.

America Didn’t Just Change — It Was Systematically Poisoned How decades of corporate power and political strategy rewired the country from within…

America Didn’t Just Change — It Was Systematically Poisoned
How decades of corporate power and political strategy rewired the country from within…

Thom Hartmann
Mar 20

Donald Trump lied us into a war with Iran that now threatens to ignite the globe. He’s been accused of raping 13-year-old girls. He made a shocking joke in the White House yesterday, speaking with the Prime Minister of Japan, about Pearl Harbor, provoking an international incident. He attacked Venezuela and is now threatening Cuba. And whatever Vladimir Putin wants, Trump gives him.

The man is poison. But it sure as hell didn’t begin with him.

Our country has been poisoned for decades now, and if we don’t remove the poison and start using the antidote, America may soon be completely unrecognizable as a “free” nation. It’s taken around 50 years, but we’re now at the point of maximum crisis.

First came the poison of big money corrupting politics.

Back in 1971, Lewis Powell thought he saw a communist threat in Ralph Nader. Literally: he named him in his infamous manifesto, the Powell Memo, arguing that calls to regulate auto safety with seat belts and soft dash boards (Nader’s book Unsafe At Any Speed) were simply the first steps toward a socialist takeover of America.

“Perhaps the single most effective antagonist of American business,” Powell wrote, “is Ralph Nader, who — thanks largely to the media — has become a legend in his own time and an idol of millions of Americans.”

Nader (who wrote the Foreword to my book The Hidden History of Monopolies: How Big Business Destroyed the American Dream) and people like Rachel Carson, with the environmental movement her book Silent Spring had inspired, threatened, Powell believed, the core of America’s free enterprise system.

Regulation, Powell (a tobacco lawyer) asserted, was just step one to a total Stalinist takeover of America.

“The overriding first need,” Powell wrote, “is for businessmen to recognize that the ultimate issue may be survival — survival of what we call the free enterprise system, and all that this means for the strength and prosperity of America and the freedom of our people.”

The following year Richard Nixon put Powell on the Supreme Court, where he personally authored the 1978 Boston v Bellotti decision that claimed billionaire and corporate money in politics wasn’t bribery or corruption (as it had been under the law since the founding of the republic) but merely an exercise of First Amendment-protected free speech. Money wasn’t money: it was speech.

That decision greased the path for the later doubling down with Citizens United, and produced a tsunami of corporate money that flooded into the GOP in 1980 (at the time the Democrats were largely funded by labor unions; their embrace of corporate money would come in 1992 with Bill Clinton’s “New Democrats”), floating Ronald Reagan and his neoliberal Reagan Revolution into power.

Since then, big business and billionaires have discovered that the investment of a few million dollars into buying politicians can produce billions or even trillions in returns. When morbidly rich hedge fund guys poured a million or so dollars into Kirsten Sinema’s coffers, for example, she demanded changes to the Inflation Reduction Act that saved them fourteen billion.

That’s one hell of a return on investment, and similar deals are made every day now: the entire GOP and the “corporate problem solver” Democrats are all in on the scam.

Whether it’s money from fossil fuel, big pharma, big chemical, big banking, big airlines, big telcom, big tech, or any other billion-dollar industry in America, the entire GOP and a handful of those “problem solver” Democrats in the House and Senate have their hands out. Literally, no other developed country in the world allows this democracy-killing corruption that five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court legalized.

Next came poisonous memes designed to turn working people against each other.

The morbidly rich, and the corporations that made them that way, hate labor unions, aka “democracy in the workplace.” Unions reduce their profits and inhibit their ability to maximally exploit their workers; unionized workers also demand accountability, a word anathema to corporations.

Reagan promoted the idea that “union bosses” were exploiting union members for their own advantage and, even though the argument made no sense (unions don’t have stock or bonus systems like corporations, so “union bosses” get a salary just like everybody else), it was picked up by the media that was, itself, run by corporations unhappy about being unionized.

TV shows in the 1980s and 1990s routinely featured corrupt or mobbed-up “union bosses” as parts of their plots, while state after state adopted “Right To Work For Less” legislation, authorized by a Republican Congress over Harry Truman’s veto in 1947, that makes it difficult for unions to survive.

Right-wing radio and Fox “News” echoed the message, and, since Reagan’s election, we’ve seen union representation go from about a third of all Americans to around 10 percent in the private workplace today.

Along with the poisoning death of our unions came the destruction of the American middle class. When Reagan came into office some estimates put the middle class — a single family’s wage-earner being able to buy a home, a car, take a vacation, put kids through school, and save for retirement or have a pension — at around 60 to 65 percent of American families. Today it’s under 45 percent.

Conservatives then set about poisoning American race relations.

This is not to say everything was hunky dory, but in the 1960s and 1970s we were making real progress. Politicians from both parties — with the broad support of the American people — passed Voting- and Civil Rights laws, we made good faith efforts to integrate schools and workplaces, and even television shows in the 1990s, led by Norman Lear’s genius, brought positive portrayals of non-white and queer people to straight white people’s TV screens in a big way for the first time.

First came Nixon’s “Southern Strategy,” openly welcoming southern white racists into the GOP. Next, tragically, in 1988 George HW Bush proved that appealing to white racism could still win elections with his notorious Willie Horton ads, setting the stage for two generations of race-baiting Republican politics that reached its zenith with Donald Trump’s racist declaration about “Mexican rapists” when he announced his candidacy in 2015.

The GOP continues this strategy today, promoting racial and religious fear and hate with Muslim bans and ICE raids, generating hysteria about Brown refugees and fighting to block any true portrayals of American racial history in our schools.

Hustlers, with help from the GOP, poisoned Christianity next.

Reagan’s campaign hired born-again alcoholic George W. Bush to work out a deal to integrate the evangelical movement — which prior to 1980 was non-political and even supported abortion rights — into the GOP. Jerry Falwell became the face of this church-and-state merger, spewing his own brand of poison.

The week after 9/11, Falwell and Pat Robertson solemnly agreed on TV that the attack on the Twin Towers was merely their god’s punishment for America tolerating “sin.”

“What we saw on Tuesday,” Falwell said on Pat Robertson’s TV show, “as terrible as it is, could be minuscule if, in fact, God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve.”

Robertson replied:

“Jerry, that’s my feeling. I think we’ve just seen the antechamber to terror. We haven’t even begun to see what they can do to the major population.”

Falwell then doubled-down:

“The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad.

“I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularise America, I point the finger in their face and say, ‘You helped this happen.’”

Robertson, nodding vigorously, added:

“I totally concur, and the problem is we have adopted that agenda at the highest levels of our government.”

And now we have evangelists like the newly reinvented Mike Flynn — a convicted and pardoned secret foreign agent who spied on us from within the White House — traveling the country today calling, essentially, for replacing our democracy with an authoritarian “Christian” government like in Russia and Hungary (and Germany and Italy in the past).

“If we are going to have one nation under God,” Flynn tells audiences repeatedly, “which we must, we have to have one religion. One nation under God, and one religion under God, right?”

Forget about the teachings of Jesus in The Sermon on the Mount and the Parable of the Goats and Sheep in Matthew 25; get yourself an AR-15 like Flynn recently strutted with on-stage. And let’s do something about all those Jews and Muslims, like Nick Fuentes recommends!

The NRA and weapons manufacturers then poured the poison of guns across our land.

Using the money Republicans on the Supreme Court authorized with the Bellotti and Citizens United decisions, combined with Scalia’s twisted Heller decision, the Supreme Court and the NRA have unleashed an epidemic of gun violence in America.

The average of all countries in the world is 9.86 guns per 100 civilians. The United States is highest in the world at 120.5 guns per 100 people. Yemen, which is in the middle of a war with Saudi Arabia and dealing with an internal insurgency, comes in second at 52.8.

No other nation is even close; even Afghanistan and Iraq average around 20 deadly weapons in the hands of every hundred people. European and Asian countries range from 10 to as low as 1 gun per hundred people.

Over on Fox “News,” one brilliant idea to deal with the slaughter of our children in our schools was to issue “Ballistic Blankets” to every school. This is how sick and twisted the Republicans taking money from the gun industry and their allies have become.

Twenty years ago, car accidents were the leading killer of children and youth: today it’s guns. This year, almost 11 out of every 100,000 children died from guns while only 8 per 100K died from car crashes. Nothing in America kills more of our children than the 400,000,000+ guns in which our country is awash (and that have made billions for the weapons industry).

White Supremacists are doing their best to poison our police and military.

There’s an active movement among white supremacist groups to spread the poison of fascism, racism, and hate to the government employees who carry the authority to legally kill people. As ABC News reported last March:

“Based on investigations between 2016 and 2020, agents and analysts with the FBI’s division in San Antonio concluded that white supremacists and other right-wing extremists would ‘very likely seek affiliation with military and law enforcement entities in furtherance of’ their ideologies, according to a confidential intelligence assessment issued late last month.’”

And the epicenter for this appears to be Stephen Miller’s ICE.

“Semi-Fascist” MAGA Republicans are poisoning our system of governance.

Former President Biden rightly called out the MAGA faction of the Republican Party; they are actively working to undermine our republic and replace it with their beloved autocratic strongman models of Orbán’s Hungary, Bolsonaro’s Brazil, and Putin’s Russia. They’re even promoting Hungary and Orbán on Fox “News,” doing fawning specials live from Budapest featuring the Big Man himself.

In multiple Republican-controlled states, legislators have made it harder to vote — particularly for low-income people, minorities, and college students — while openly working to terrorize Black voters. Ron DeSantis paraded a group of mostly Black “illegal voters” in Florida, while Texas politicians have promoted far and wide their arrests of Black “felon voters.”

It’s all about trying to terrify Black people away from the polls, if less severe efforts like outlawing “Souls to the Polls” by ending Sunday voting aren’t enough to swing elections to the GOP.

The Brennan Center documents how:

“As of Janu­ary 14, legis­lat­ors in at least 27 states have intro­duced, pre-filed, or carried over 250 bills with restrict­ive [voting] provi­sions.”

Dozens are now law, and next is their SAVE America Act, which they don’t expect will pass but they will point to when Democrats win this coming November, claiming those victories were the result of fraud.

Meanwhile, Republican appointees on the Supreme Court let Republican secretaries of state cancel the voter registrations of over 20 million Americans in the last dozen years with their Ohio decision.

The Supreme Court has also allowed Republican secretaries of state to reduce the number of voting machines and voting locations, particularly in Black, Hispanic and college town neighborhoods, to force people wanting to vote into long, discouraging lines.

And they’re poisoning our social and news media.

In early 1944, the New York Times asked Vice President Henry Wallace to, as Wallace noted, “write a piece answering the following questions: What is a fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?”

Vice President Wallace’s answer to those questions was published in The New York Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the Axis powers of Germany and Japan.

“The really dangerous American fascists,” Wallace wrote, “are not those who are hooked up directly or indirectly with the Axis. The FBI has its finger on those. The dangerous American fascist is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way.”

As if he had a time machine and could see the “conservative” media landscape today, Wallace continued:

“The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money and more power.”

Today CNN is about to be taken over by a hard-right nepo-baby billionaire just like CBS and TikTok (which has banned my show). There’s a network of “nearly 1300” websites purporting to be those of local newspapers but that are really rightwing propaganda operations, and dozens of actual rightwing “local” newspapers that are often stuck for free in people’s mailboxes.

Putin, Trump, Orbán, Xi, and other autocrats and rightwing billionaires are trying to poison democracies worldwide.

Donald Trump famously embraced autocrats, dictators, sheiks, and killers while snubbing leaders of democracies and working to destroy NATO and the United Nations. His family has taken in billions from the Middle East as he pursues a war against Iran that Netanyahu, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE have lobbied American presidents to undertake for over a generation.

Meanwhile, Russian and Chinese intelligence services run disinformation campaigns that fill social media with lies and information designed to tear democracies apart; they’re having considerable success in their efforts, including putting Trump in the White House in 2016 and 2024, and pushing through Brexit.

Republicans in Congress are even openly opposing Ukraine in that nation’s valiant battle against Russia’s terror campaign: most recently it was 11 Republican Senators and 57 Republican members of the House who proudly voted with Putin over America and Ukraine.

Rand Paul, who secretly carried a stash of documents (from Mar-a-Lago’s bathroom?) to Russia on behalf of Donald Trump to hand-deliver to Putin’s intelligence service, even argued that we should end the Espionage Act, while his Republican colleagues were demanding Congress defund the FBI.

This November we can deliver the antidote to all this GOP poison.

This isn’t the first time “conservative” racists and fascists have poisoned America.

The oligarchs of the Confederacy did it in the first half of the 19th century, and progressive President Abraham Lincoln defeated them in the Civil War.

And the first third of the 20th century was haunted by the rise of the Klan and the Republican Great Depression, until progressive President Franklin Roosevelt declared political war on them, saying, “[T]hey hate me, and I welcome their hatred!”

As FDR and his Vice President Henry Wallace showed us, the most effective way to reverse the effects of fascist poison in the bloodstream of our body politic is for progressives to take power and put both the nation and the middle class back together.

FDR, Truman, and Eisenhower — two Democrats and a Republican — renewed the faith of the American people in the government our Founders created and many died to give us.

They taught us that civic engagement — voting and participating in our political system — is the best antidote to fascist poison.

Forty-plus years of Reaganism, as I lay out in my book The Hidden History of Neoliberalism: How Reaganism Gutted America, is best remedied by purging right-wing poisoners from political power and then taking active steps to rebuild our nation.

Steps that Republicans and a handful of sellout Democrats have fought tooth-and-nail in their service to spreading the fascist poison of giant monopolies and the morbidly rich. They profit from keeping working peoples’ wages and benefits low, exploiting student debt, and forcing our public schools into crisis with bizarre anti-DEI laws and book bans.

This year will feature, more than any time since the Civil War, an unprecedented referendum on democracy. Fully sixty percent of Americans will have an “election denier” Trump-humping Republican on the ballot this November.

Time is short and both the danger of fascism and the opportunity to renew America are at our doorsteps.

Double-check your voter registrations (they can be challenged by Republicans even in Blue states) and do everything you can to wake up friends and neighbors to this very real danger to our republic. And get out on the streets on the 28th for No Kings Day!

Trump Is Getting Drilled, Baby, Drilled And he has no one to blame but himself.

Trump Is Getting Drilled, Baby, Drilled
And he has no one to blame but himself.

Andrew Egger and Jim Swift (The Bulwark)

Trump Is Getting Drilled, Baby, Drilled
And he has no one to blame but himself.
Andrew Egger and Jim Swift

Mar 20

There has always been a chasm between the actual MAGA voters and the MAGA intelligentsia that purports to speak for them, but it has rarely been as visible as it is this week. Many of the leading lights of the literate right have been pulling their hair out (with good reason!) over the Iran war, with Christopher Caldwell declaring it “the end of Trumpism” in the Spectator and Sohrab Ahmari proclaiming that “Trump was never the one” in UnHerd. At least so far, the base does not agree: A new Politico poll finds that only 12 percent of 2024 Trump voters oppose the war in Iran so far. Happy Friday.

‘Oh No, the Consequences of My Actions!’
by Andrew Egger

Twenty-four hours ago, it looked like our war in Iran might be about to spiral really, really out of control. Iran had been playing havoc with global energy prices by blockading the Strait of Hormuz, but until this week damage to the region’s actual energy production infrastructure had been minimal. That changed after Israel struck a major Iranian gas field Wednesday, to which Iran responded with further strikes against energy infrastructure around the region.

One Iranian missile managed to strike an oil refinery in northern Israel, although Israeli officials said the facility had escaped significant damage. Qatar wasn’t so lucky. Iranian strikes pummelled its liquefied natural gas infrastructure. Shell-shocked QatarEnergy officials emerged yesterday to quantify the damage: an estimated 17 percent of the country’s export capacity was knocked out, an estimated $20 billion in lost annual revenue was lost until $26 billion in repairs can be made.

This latest alarming development in the conflict has put President Donald Trump in an extremely strange place. He remains the prime mover of the entire war; Israel, for all its own might, likely wouldn’t keep it going if Trump pulled out and demanded it do the same. It’s on his orders that America is still busily bombing the daylights out of Iran—and spending down stockpiles of precious munitions like missile interceptors. Every day that goes by with America seemingly no closer to accomplishing its vague war aims, the administration seems to relearn the same lesson: Okay, guess we just didn’t hit them hard enough yet. Yesterday morning, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth promised that yesterday’s bombardment would be the most extensive one to date.

And yet Trump is plainly growing more and more preoccupied with the war’s toll in spiking energy prices. Asked in the Oval Office yesterday whether he was considering surging more U.S. troops to the region, the president pivoted instantly to economy talk: “No, I’m not putting troops anywhere… And we will do whatever is necessary to keep the price low.” As he jabbered on, he fell into the same sort of wistful tone he used to strike five years ago when talking about his pre-COVID economy: “Everything was going great. The economy was great. Oil prices were very low. Gasoline was dropping. . . . And I saw what was happening in Iran, and I said, ‘I hate to make this excursion, but we’re gonna have to do it.’”

Trump is right to be worried. And he’s right in particular to be completely freaked out by the possibility of more attacks from either side on the region’s energy infrastructure. Putting LNG and oil production facilities on the legitimate targets list would mean heavy long-term damage to the energy economy. Trump knows how little buy-in the American public has for this war even on its own merits and how little pain people will be willing to suffer on its behalf. For him, the single most important thing he needs to accomplish in this conflict is a crisp end date—preferably very soon. Pretty much his worst-case scenario would be higher energy prices for the rest of his term because the Middle East’s energy infrastructure had been reduced to rubble.

So Trump, in addition to his role as bombardier-in-chief against Iran, has taken on a strange second role as well: independent referee trying to enforce a no-more-energy-strikes-or-else policy on the entire region, friend and foe alike. Here he was on Wednesday night on Truth Social:

Israel, out of anger for what has taken place in the Middle East, has violently lashed out at a major facility known as South Pars Gas Field in Iran. A relatively small section of the whole has been hit. The United States knew nothing about this particular attack,¹ and the country of Qatar was in no way, shape, or form involved with it, nor did it have any idea that it was going to happen. ² Unfortunately, Iran did not know this, or any of the pertinent facts pertaining to the South Pars attack, and unjustifiably and unfairly attacked a portion of Qatar’s LNG Gas facility. NO MORE ATTACKS WILL BE MADE BY ISRAEL pertaining to this extremely important and valuable South Pars Field unless Iran unwisely decides to attack a very innocent party, in this case, Qatar³—in which instance the United States of America, with or without the help or consent of Israel, will massively blow up the entirety of the South Pars Gas Field at an amount of strength and power that Iran has never seen or witnessed before.

Trump is playing with fire here, but this sort of mad king threat has worked for him in the past and could work again: at least for the moment, the attacks on energy seem to have stopped.

But the whole alarming affair is a good analogy for the Iran conflict writ large—indeed, for Trump’s whole floundering second term. Trump is spending his time this week fighting tooth and nail just to get back to the previous status quo—an Iran war that mostly spares globally vital energy infrastructure. Zoom back, and he’s fighting to get to another, higher-order previous status quo: no war in Iran at all to drive prices up like crazy. Zoom back one more time, and it’s the story of his whole second term: He’s fighting just to get back to the levels of support he had this time last year as the midterms loom and his coalition crashes down around him.