Category Archives: Election 2015

Don Braid: Harper cushions his campaign against Alberta-style surprise

Don Braid: Harper cushions his campaign against Alberta-style surprise

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Alberta's NDP Premier Rachel Notley

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntoshPrime Minister Stephen Harper and Alberta’s NDP Premier Rachel Notley

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has decreed an election period as long as Pinocchio’s nose. Besides handing the Conservatives a severe money advantage, this makes it easier for Harper to switch campaign tactics if Alberta politics start breaking out all over Canada.

Alberta has an NDP government partly because of timing. The four-week campaign that ended May 5 was just long enough for Albertans to work themselves into a fine fury at Premier Jim Prentice’s Progressive Conservatives.

Prentice would surely have loved another two weeks to yank his wildly misguided campaign back into reality.

Complete Story

The Guardian view on Canada’s elections: is the Stephen Harper era over?

 – The October elections offer Canada a chance to return to the country’s best traditions
Tuesday 4 August 2015

Canadian Liberal leader Justin Trudeau on the campaign trail

Justin Trudeau, the Canadian Liberal leader, campaigning in Mississauga on Tuesday. ‘Mean-spirited negative campaigning’ on behalf of Stephen Harper ‘is zeroing in on the youth and good looks of Trudeau.’ Photograph: Mark Blinch/Reuters

It is the second biggest country in the world, yet sometimes it seems almost invisible. Often ignored by its powerful neighbour, regarded with only distant affection by the two European countries from which its settlers came, and taken for granted by many nations who should be more grateful than they are for its help and mediation in the past, Canada ploughs a lonely furrow. Now it is heading toward an election that will determine whether it will continue along the predictable rightward course set by Stephen Harper as prime minister over the past decade or whether it can recover some of the verve and originality that once marked its politics, not least under Pierre Trudeau, whose son Justin is one of the contenders.

Under Mr Harper, Canada has not only moved to the right in almost every area of policy but has entered an era of highly calibrated, money-driven negative campaigning at odds with the courtesy that is one of the most attractive of Canadian qualities. So the result matters, obviously for Canada itself, but also for a world that has long been missing the special role it used to play on the international scene.

Money, its uses and its abuses, runs like a thread through Mr Harper’s time in power. At the very beginning, a scandal over the diversion of government funds under the then Liberal government helped him into office in 2006. Ironically, it then turned out that his Conservative party had itself been breaking electoral laws on spending during that campaign. Forming another minority government after the 2008 election, he began dismantling Canada’s system of political party subsidies, a policy that benefits the Conservatives, who have the largest base of wealthy donors, and puts other parties, particularly the Liberals, at a financial disadvantage.
Canada election 2015: a guide to the parties, polls and electoral system
Read more
A strategy aimed at spending his opponents into the ground seems to be once again behind his launching of the campaign for the next general election well ahead of it being formally called this week. Much of the money goes on mean-spirited negative campaigning of the kind that saw off the Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff in the 2011 election with gibes about his years away from Canada. Now it is zeroing in on the youth and good looks of Justin Trudeau, the new Liberal leader, suggesting he is too wet behind the ears to be prime minister.

Money came to Mr Harper’s rescue in a different way during the international fiscal crisis, because Canada’s prudent and well-regulated banking system and its stable housing market insulated it from the worst effects. None of this was Mr Harper’s doing – his own instincts are antiregulatory – but he got some of the credit. Money, in the shape of profits from tar sands, also influenced the notorious decision to withdraw from the Kyoto protocol, and Canada’s pledges ahead of the next international environmental conference in Paris are the weakest of any major industrial country. In spite of what Thomas Mulcair, leader of the New Democratic party, calls this “rip it and ship it” philosophy, Canada’s economy has faltered in recent years, and Canada is near, or perhaps already in, recession. The fall in oil prices is partly to blame, but his critics say that Mr Harper’s emphasis on a balanced budget at a time when the economy needs stimulus, not constraint, as well as giving tax breaks to the better-off, has made things worse.

Advertisement

Domestically Mr Harper has tried to move Canada away from its social democratic tradition, reducing government spending and services, privatising government agencies, cutting public health. He has gagged government scientists and civil servants, is bringing in new internal security laws, and made Canada a less open society. Internationally he has made the Canada that begged to differ (with Britain on Suez, on Vietnam with America, for example) and the Canada that was a pillar of peacekeeping and the United Nations a distant memory. And his particularly passionate identification with Israel has lost Canada the “honest broker” status that it arguably enjoyed in the Middle East in the past.

The political contest in Canada this time is particularly difficult to predict since the three big parties each have about 30% in popular support. Any of the three could end up in government, alone or in coalition. But we may be permitted to hope there is now a chance that something of the old Canada, committed to moderation and multiculturalism at home and to multilateralism and cooperation abroad, will re-emerge from the fray.

Original Story

 

#HarperBlamesAlbertans Takes Off After Harper Calls Alberta NDP Government A ‘Disaster’

CP

Stephen Harper took an online lashing from Albertans after making a dig at the province’s NDP government this week.

During a campaign stop in Laval, Que., the Conservative leader addressed an audience in French and criticized the Alberta government’s decision to delay the release of its provincial budget until October.

“We have an experiment like this going on in Alberta right now,” Harper said.

“The Alberta government, the new NDP government, in their first action they are incapable of presenting a budget. They raised taxes … the result is a disaster. It’s a disaster and (it’s) rejected by the population.”

Harper did not acknowledge his own government’s decision to delay tabling itsfederal budget earlier this year. Joe Oliver had cited the need for more time to assess the impact of plunging oil prices amid “market instability.”

Twitter users took advantage of the discrepancy between the Conservative leader’s remarks and its own government actions, by having some fun with the hashtag#HarperBlamesAlbertans:

Best of #HarperBlamesAlbertans

Mary Linville
When Harper delays a budget it is fiscal prudence, when Notley delays a budget it is “a disaster”. All righty then.

Mary Linville
Everett Coldwell
Let me get this straight. for throwing out a government that overspent, lacked vision, and took orders from business.

Marty Chan
Between spats with Premiers Wynne & Notley, Harper looks like the drunk at bar trying to pick fight with door.

Melissa Hills
Whoa Steve, you do NOT want to take on Notley. You should see what happened to the last guy

Peggy Blair
You Albertans stupidly chose to vote for a disaster but I won’t offend you directly, I’ll say it in French. Wow.
Marty Chan
Harper is huddled in closet & muttering, “As god as my witness, I didn’t think Albertans spoke French.

Jay Gamble
Wait, wait, wait. Did Harper just go?. Maybe he should hire Navigator for guidance.

Stephanie Ferguson
Go ahead and tell Alberta voters they screwed up Harper, it worked for Prentice – oh, wait…

Tynan Phillips
I knew this would be a long , I didn’t expect it to be so pathetic: Harper lies/misleads in his speech then

Brandon Tozzo
I’m not sure of the wisdom of insulting the voters that are your base of support. Didn’t work well for Kim Campbell.

B D Hone
You remember what happened the last time a leader called an early elxn & blamed Albertans right?
When Harper delays a budget it is fiscal prudence, when Notley delays a budget it is “a disaster”. All righty then.
 “Wait, wait, wait. Did Harper just go full Prentice?” asked one Twitter user in reference to an infamous comment made by ousted former Premier Jim Prentice in March.

The hashtag is a rip off of #PrenticeBlamesAlbertans, after the ex-Progressive Conservative premier told voters during the provincial election campaign that they need to “only look in the mirror” to see who’s to blame for billions in lost oil revenue.

Prentice would go on to lose the election — by a landslide — to the NDP’s Rachel Notley.

On Tuesday, Notley hit back at Harper and issued a statement, asserting her government has taken action to buck a “fiscal shortfall” inherited from “years of Conservative mismanagement” and the oil price drop.

“Protecting the jobs and incomes of regular working families rather than that of wealthy Conservative friends and insiders is the best way to put our province on the path to the economic recovery,” she said.

With files from the Canadian Press

Original Story

 

Stephen Harper adds premiers to his list of electoral opponents: Tim Harper

The Conservative leader’s campaign offers a hint of scorched earth as he goes after Kathleen Wynne and Rachel Notley.

Now that he's campaigning against premiers like Alberta's Rachel Notley, Stephen Harper has added another chapter in the saga of the outsider, giving the early days of his 2015 re-election bid a hint of scorched earth, writes Tim Harper.

ANDREW VAUGHAN / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO

Now that he’s campaigning against premiers like Alberta’s Rachel Notley, Stephen Harper has added another chapter in the saga of the outsider, giving the early days of his 2015 re-election bid a hint of scorched earth, writes Tim Harper.

Stephen Harper has always seemed most comfortable as a self-styled “outsider,” no matter how oxymoronic that might sound from someone who lives at 24 Sussex Drive.

Depending on his needs, he can find elites in courtrooms or newsrooms to rally his troops and he likes to tell us he avoids the trappings of office, from power lunches to black tie soirees.

But now that he is campaigning against provincial premiers, Harper has added another chapter in the saga of the outsider, giving the early days of his 2015 re-election bid a hint of scorched earth.

It’s starting to look like Harper against the world and he appears to like it this way.

But it also reveals a glaring blind spot for this man—his inability to accommodate anyone who does not share his ideological bent.

Complete Story

Premier Notley unloads on Harper after his remarks badmouthing the Alberta NDP government

rick-bell

BY , CALGARY SUN

FIRST POSTED: | UPDATED:

TCP_JMC117284286Alberta Premier Rachel Notley, left, meets with Prime Minister Stephen Harper in Calgary, Alta., on Monday, July 6, 2015.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

Stephen Harper throws down the gauntlet. Premier Notley picks it up.

Harper fires a missile Notley’s way though it’s clearly meant for federal NDP leader Thomas Mulcair.

The Conservative leader takes aim at the provincial NDP for being “incapable of producing a budget” while raising taxes — a corporate tax hike and a progressive income tax scheme where tax rates go up on yearly taxable income over $125,000.

The Conservative leader calls the result a “disaster” and says it’s been rejected by Albertans.

On Tuesday, Notley returns fire. The premier says she is “protecting the jobs and incomes of regular working families rather than that of wealthy Conservative friends and insiders.”

Ouch.

Notley says her NDP government replaced “regressive taxes with better ones.”

She says they threw out the health care tax proposed by the Prentice PCs.

The premier says Alberta now has “normal corporate taxes” and a “normal progressive income tax system” like other provinces in Canada.

Notley adds Albertans still have the lowest provincial tax load in the country.

Joe Ceci enters the fray, fresh from a meeting at the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, not exactly an NDP crowd.

Ceci is the Alberta NDP budget boss and brought in the tax measures.

“He’s electioneering,” says Ceci, accusing Harper of whipping things up.

“Everybody understands what elections are all about. They’re for saying things that get the attention of the populace. While they may not be accurate they do get people’s attention.

“In many ways there have been lots of people pleased with what’s happened in Alberta. I listen more to that than I do some other things.”

As in, what Harper says.

Conservative website promotes Stephen Harper with taxpayer-funded ’24/Seven’ videos

AUGUST 05, 2015 by

On Sunday, Stephen Harper explained that the reason he was calling the longest election in Canadian history since 1872 was that he feels the money for this election should “come from the parties themselves, not from the government resources, parliamentary resources or taxpayers’ resources.”

Well, guess what?

Not even a week later, the Conservative Party of Canada is actually promoting Harper using his 24/Seven vanity videos – which are taxpayer-funded and produced out of the Privy Council Office – on their own official website. Check it out:

conservativeca-24seven.jpg

The screenshot above, which appears at the URL http://www.conservative.ca/pm-harper/ is current as of 12:30 pm August 5, 2015.

Complete Story

 

Child-care benefit could be a potential $43,160 bonanza for B.C. polygamist with 133 children

Do the arithmetic of 20 children under seven and 78 between the ages of seven and 18 and it adds up to a $43,160 payday for Bountiful, B.C. polygamist Winston Blackmore, shown in 2012 leaving a Vancouver court, and his wives.

Jason Payne / PNGDo the arithmetic of 20 children under seven and 78 between the ages of seven and 18 and it adds up to a $43,160 payday for Bountiful, B.C. polygamist Winston Blackmore, shown in 2012 leaving a Vancouver court, and his wives.

There was no bigger winner than Bountiful, B.C., polygamist Winston Blackmore last month when the Canadian government sent out cheques for the expanded Universal Child Care Benefit.

Blackmore, who is awaiting trial on a single criminal charge of polygamy, has 133 children ranging in age from babies to adults.

For every child under the age of six, Canadian parents received $520, and for every child aged seven to 18, they received $420, with no restrictions on how the money could be spent.

Using the best information available from several sources, the 58-year-old fundamentalist Mormon leader has as many as 98 children who are 18 or younger, and as many as 20 of those are seven and younger.

Complete Story

Long election could scuttle Harper’s ability to claim privilege in Duffy trial testimony

Stephen Harper may have to testify at Duffy's trial after all.

Rod MacIvor/Postmedia News FilesStephen Harper may have to testify at Duffy’s trial after all.

An unintended consequence of the exceedingly long election campaign of 78 days is that MPs’ parliamentary privilege will expire during the writ period.

Normally, this would be mere trivia, but this campaign is being waged during the ongoing criminal trial of suspended senator Mike Duffy.

His trial, currently in hiatus, resumes August 12, and the crucial testimony of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s chief of staff, Nigel Wright, is expected on that day or shortly after.

in Election 2015, that privilege will expire at the mid-way point of the campaign, on September 11, 2015.

When the privilege resumes — the 40 days before the next session– would depend on when parliament resumes sitting, with the swearing in of MPs.

Should the elected prime minister, whoever he or she might be, bring parliament back the day after the election, October 20, then the privilege would extend retroactively back to September 10, 2015.

There is, however, no need to recall parliament so quickly. Usually, several weeks or months pass after an election before the session begins. Indeed, some have speculated that the House will not sit again until later in the fall or maybe not until early in the new year.

Complete Story

Refugees and income assistance – rebutting the chain email (“pensioners’ myth”)

Source URL: http://ccrweb.ca/en/refugees-and-income-assistance-rebutting-chain-email-pensioners-myth

Responding to chain email with false information

Have you heard rumours that refugees in Canada receive greater assistance from the government than pensioners?

For several years, a persistent chain email has been circulating claiming that refugees receive significantly more money in income assistance than Canadians collecting a pension.  The information, which is based on a letter published in the Toronto Star, is false. The record has been set straight by the federal government and the Canadian Council for Refugees.

Refugees come to Canada in different ways, but no matter the category, refugees receive very limited income assistance from the government.

The true picture is that:

  • Refugee claimants and refugees recognized by the Immigration and Refugee Board receive no special income assistance.  They may, depending on provincial regulations, be entitled, like other residents, to social assistance.
  • Privately sponsored refugees are not entitled to government assistance (including provincial assistance) during the period of their sponsorship (usually for one year after arrival in Canada).  Their income support must be provided by their sponsors.
  • Government assisted refugees have access to financial assistance from the federal government through the Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP).  This financial assistance is generally for one year maximum and is received only if they do not have their own financial resources or income. The exact rate depends on the size of the family and is tied to social assistance rates.  In Ontario in July 2013, for example, a single person receives $781 per month.  In addition, government-assisted refugees are entitled to a one-time set up allowance, to cover such things as clothes, basic household effects and staples, and telephone installation.  For a single person there is a maximum one-time allowance of $905, plus a $564 loan for house rental and telephone line deposits.

Most resettled refugees arrive in Canada with a significant debt burden, since they are expected to repay the Canadian government for their transportation to Canada as well as the cost of their medical examination undertaken as part of their processing to come to Canada.  Refugee families therefore often begin life in Canada with a debt running to thousands of dollars.  Interest is charged on this loan at a rate set by the Department of Finance each year.

For more information on transportation loans for resettled refugees and the devastating impacts they have, see: http://ccrweb.ca/en/transportation-loans and http://www.ccrweb.ca/documents/loansEN.pdf

Have you received a chain email or read a letter to the editor spreading this false information?

  • ‘Don’t believe everything you read in the paper…’ The same applies to the Internet!
  • Think before you click –Sending on this email can have devastating impacts.  It spreads false rumours, hurting people who have already suffered in their home countries. Let’s offer them a better welcome to Canada than unfounded stigmas and prejudices.

How can you set the record straight?

  • Respond to the email with correct information and facts to the person who sent you this false information.  Give them the facts.  Ask them to send this information on to everyone that they sent the message to.  Here is a sample email message that you can use:

The information in this email is FALSE. 

Passing it on can have devastating impacts.  It spreads false rumours, hurting people who have already suffered in their home countries. Let’s show them a better welcome to Canada than unfounded stigmas and prejudices.

Put yourself in the shoes of a refugee in Canada – the TRUE picture is that some refugees who come to Canada receive no financial assistance from the government, and others at most extremely limited income assistance.

  • On top of a limited income, refugees resettled to Canada also arrive with a huge debt because they have to repay Canada for their travel costs.  Imagine arriving in Canada owing a debt greater than what you earned in your entire working life.  Many government-assisted refugees do just that and they must pay back the costs of their transportation to Canada, with interest.  For some families this can be as much as $10,000.  This is a huge burden for a refugee family that is starting fresh in a new country, with a new language to learn and few connections.  For more information, see: http://ccrweb.ca/en/transportation-loans

Please send this information back to anyone who has received this false information to set the record straight. For more information see the websites of the department of Citizenship and Immigration Canada (http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/faq/refugees/index.asp#support) and the Canadian Council for Refugees (ccrweb.ca/en/refugees-and-income-assistance-rebutting-chain-email-pensioners-myth).

  • Post a response to this chain email on your website or in your blog, with the correct information.
  • If the rumour is circulating widely in your community, talk to journalists at your local radio station or community newspaper to produce a piece with the correct information.  Take the opportunity to raise the realities and challenges faced by refugees in your community.

Looking for more information?

Explanation of the origins of the email by Toronto Star ombudsperson (below)

You Asked For It, article published by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, Sept.-Oct. 2005, responding to the chain email

Citizenship and Immigration Canada: Do government-assisted refugees get more income support and benefits than Canadian pensioners do?.

Citizenship and Immigration Canada: Financial support for Government-Assisted Refugees

For a rebuttal of a US version of the myth, see Snopes.com (a site dedicated to getting the facts on urban legends)

A version of the myth also made an appearance in Australia: ABC, MediaWatch


The Toronto Star ombudsperson published the following explanation of the origins of the email:

“Today’s rather sad and twisted tale began last March when the Star published a feature about plans to settle hundreds of African refugees in smaller Canadian cities. It was a simple story: Canada and the United Nations were flying asylum-seekers from a Somali refugee camp to new lives in centres such as Hamilton. As immigration/diversity reporter Nicholas Keung wrote, immigration officials hope to encourage (but not force) refugees to make new lives outside the magnet cities of Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. “We hope by relocating them all together and resettling them as a whole to the same community, we can create a positive environment to help them integrate into the Canadian society successfully,” an immigration official explained.

Fine and dandy. But halfway through the 1,500-word article, unforeseen trouble was lurking. In paragraph 16, the story said single refugees are eligible for $1,890 from Ottawa as a “start-up allowance, along with a $580 monthly social assistance, depending on how soon the person is able to find employment.” In addition, they get “a night lamp, a table, a chair and a single bed from the government,” the story said. In painful hindsight, those details could have been clearer. Actually, the $1,890 “start-up allowance” – including a $580 monthly social assistance cheque from Ottawa – was a one-time payment for basic household needs such as furnishings, pots and linens. The furniture is used. In quick order, two things happened after the article ran. First, a reader sent a nasty e-mail to the reporter. Among other things, it said charity begins at home and Canada should not “roll out the welcome mat” for refugees. The e-mailer assumed – erroneously – that the refugees would collect $2,470 a month. They’d be better off than Canadian pensioners.

More worrisome, the polemicist sent his rant to 100 recipients, some of whom likely spread the word to wider audiences. Ah, the wonders of the Internet! Alarmed by the e-mail, reporter Keung tried to contact the sender. It was too late. Having spread the misinformation, the e-mailer already had changed his address. At the same time, a second development occurred. The Star ran a letter to the editor that said the $2,470 “compares very well to a single pensioner who after contributing to the growth and development of Canada for 40 years can only receive a monthly maximum of $1,012 in old age pension and Guaranteed Income Supplement. “Maybe our pensioners should apply as refugees?” reasoned the writer.

Readers may not realize that fact checking of letters to the editor is nearly impossible at most daily papers, given limited staff resources and unforgiving deadlines. Although many mistakes are caught, the occasional doozer gets through. That was definitely the case here. Over the next several months, it became increasingly clear a disturbing urban myth had been born. Various offices at the Star have been getting e-mails from around the world, usually one or two a week. Many quote from the erroneous letter to the editor, expressing varying degrees of curiosity, dismay, envy or anger. “Let’s send this to all Canadians,” one e-mail roared, “so we can all be p—– off and maybe we can get the refugees cut back to $1,012 and the pensioners up to $2,470 and enjoy some of the money we were forced to submit to the government over the last 40 or 50 years.” In hindsight, the ombud now wishes he’d issued a speedy clarification to help set the record straight. But with information (and misinformation) moving at warp speed on the Internet, I doubt there was a silver bullet for the problem. Maybe this column can help dispel a damaging misperception about refugees and pensioners. Please tell your friends.”  (Toronto Star, Nov. 27, 2004.  Reproduced with permission – Torstar Syndication Services).


One version of the email reads as follows:

Only in Canada.

Do not apply for your old age pension. Apply to be a refugee. It is interesting that the federal government provides a single refugee with a monthly allowance of $1,890.00 and each can get an additional $580.00 in social assistance for a total of $2,470.00.

This compares very well to a single pensioner who, after contributing to the growth and development of Canada for 40 or 50 years, can only receive a monthly maximum of $1,012.00 in old age pension and Guaranteed Income Supplement.

Maybe our pensioners should apply as refugees!

Let’s send this thought to as many Canadians as we can and maybe we can get the refugees cut back to $1,012.00 and the pensioners up to $2,470.00, so they can enjoy the money they were forced to submit to the Canadian government for those 40 to 50 years.

Please forward this to every Canadian you know.